Make (Integromat) vs Asana AI
A detailed comparison of Make (Integromat) and Asana AI. Find out which AI Operations solution is right for your team.
📌Key Takeaways
- 1Make (Integromat) vs Asana AI: Comparing 6 criteria.
- 2Make (Integromat) wins 6 categories, Asana AI wins 0, with 0 ties.
- 3Make (Integromat): 4.3/5 rating. Asana AI: 4.2/5 rating.
- 4Overall recommendation: Make (Integromat) edges ahead in this comparison.
Make (Integromat)
Visual automation platform with AI agents, 2,000+ app integrations, and advanced workflow logic for complex automations
Asana AI
Work management platform with AI Studio for building custom workflows, agents, and automated task management
6
Make (Integromat) wins
0
Ties
0
Asana AI wins
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Make (Integromat) | Asana AI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow Complexity | 4 | 3 | Make (Integromat) |
| Integrations | 4 | 3 | Make (Integromat) |
| Error Handling | 5 | 4 | Make (Integromat) |
| Scalability | 5 | 4 | Make (Integromat) |
| Monitoring | 5 | 4 | Make (Integromat) |
| Ease of Use | 5 | 4 | Make (Integromat) |
Detailed Analysis
Workflow Complexity
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)'s workflow complexity capabilities
Asana AI
Asana AI's workflow complexity capabilities
Comparing workflow complexity between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI.
Integrations
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)'s integrations capabilities
Asana AI
Asana AI's integrations capabilities
Comparing integrations between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI.
Error Handling
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)'s error handling capabilities
Asana AI
Asana AI's error handling capabilities
Comparing error handling between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI.
Scalability
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)'s scalability capabilities
Asana AI
Asana AI's scalability capabilities
Comparing scalability between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI.
Monitoring
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)'s monitoring capabilities
Asana AI
Asana AI's monitoring capabilities
Comparing monitoring between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI.
Ease of Use
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat)'s ease of use capabilities
Asana AI
Asana AI's ease of use capabilities
Comparing ease of use between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI.
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Visual Scenario Builder
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make's visual scenario builder provides an infinite canvas where users construct automations by dragging and dropping application modules and connecting them with data flow lines. Each module represents a specific action within an application—such as creating a record, sending an email, or fetching data—and users configure these modules through intuitive forms rather than code. The visual approach makes complex workflows comprehensible at a glance, with color-coded modules, clear data flow indicators, and the ability to zoom in on specific sections or view the entire automation architecture. Users can build branching logic with routers, handle errors gracefully with dedicated error handlers, and iterate over data sets using built-in array functions. Enables non-technical users to build sophisticated automations that would traditionally require developer resources, reducing automation development time by up to 90%.
✓ Enables non-technical users to build sophisticated automations that would traditionally require developer resources, reducing automation development time by up to 90%
Asana AI
Asana AI's project planning capability transforms how teams initiate and structure new initiatives by leveraging natural language processing to interpret project requirements and automatically generate comprehensive project frameworks. Users simply describe their project goals, constraints, and desired outcomes in conversational language, and the AI assistant creates a complete project structure including logically organized tasks, subtasks with clear dependencies, realistic timeline estimates based on similar historical projects, and suggested milestones. The system considers factors like team capacity, typical task durations, and industry-specific workflows to produce plans that are immediately actionable rather than requiring extensive manual refinement. Reduces project setup time from hours to minutes while ensuring consistent, comprehensive project structures that follow organizational best practices.
✓ Reduces project setup time from hours to minutes while ensuring consistent, comprehensive project structures that follow organizational best practices
Both Make (Integromat) and Asana AI offer Visual Scenario Builder. Make (Integromat)'s approach focuses on make's visual scenario builder provides an infinite canvas where users construct automations by dragging and dropping application modules and connecting them with data flow lines., while Asana AI emphasizes asana ai's project planning capability transforms how teams initiate and structure new initiatives by leveraging natural language processing to interpret project requirements and automatically generate comprehensive project frameworks.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
1,500+ App Integrations
Asana AIMake (Integromat)
Make maintains one of the largest libraries of pre-built application integrations in the automation industry, with over 1,500 native connectors spanning every major category of business software. Each integration includes multiple modules covering the full range of actions available in that application's API, from basic CRUD operations to advanced functionality. The integrations are continuously updated to reflect API changes and new features, ensuring reliability and access to the latest capabilities. For applications without native integrations, Make provides universal HTTP modules, webhook triggers, and GraphQL support that can connect to virtually any web service with an API. Eliminates the need for custom API development for the vast majority of integration needs, allowing teams to connect their entire tech stack within a single platform.
✓ Eliminates the need for custom API development for the vast majority of integration needs, allowing teams to connect their entire tech stack within a single platform
Asana AI
The intelligent summarization feature employs advanced natural language understanding to automatically analyze and condense lengthy project communications, status updates, comment threads, and meeting notes into clear, actionable summaries. The AI identifies key decisions, action items, blockers, and progress updates, presenting them in a structured format that enables stakeholders to quickly grasp project status without reading through extensive documentation. The system adapts its summarization style based on the audience—providing executive-level overviews for leadership and more detailed technical summaries for project teams—ensuring information is always presented at the appropriate level of detail. Keeps all stakeholders informed and aligned without information overload, saving hours of reading time while ensuring critical updates are never missed.
✓ Keeps all stakeholders informed and aligned without information overload, saving hours of reading time while ensuring critical updates are never missed
Both Make (Integromat) and Asana AI offer 1,500+ App Integrations. Make (Integromat)'s approach focuses on make maintains one of the largest libraries of pre-built application integrations in the automation industry, with over 1,500 native connectors spanning every major category of business software., while Asana AI emphasizes intelligent summarization feature employs advanced natural language understanding to automatically analyze and condense lengthy project communications, status updates, comment threads, and meeting notes into clear, actionable summaries.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Advanced Data Transformation
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make includes a comprehensive suite of data transformation functions that allow users to manipulate, format, and restructure data as it flows between applications. The platform provides over 100 built-in functions covering text manipulation, mathematical operations, date/time formatting, array processing, and data type conversion. Users can access these functions through a visual formula builder that provides autocomplete suggestions and real-time validation. Complex transformations that would require custom code in other platforms can be accomplished through Make's visual interface, including parsing JSON/XML, aggregating data from multiple sources, and restructuring nested data objects. Ensures data compatibility between applications with different data formats and structures, eliminating manual data cleanup and transformation tasks.
✓ Ensures data compatibility between applications with different data formats and structures, eliminating manual data cleanup and transformation tasks
Asana AI
Asana AI's smart task generation capability automatically creates detailed, well-structured tasks from minimal input, dramatically reducing the administrative burden on project managers and team leads. When users provide brief descriptions of work that needs to be done, the AI expands these into comprehensive task definitions including clear titles, detailed descriptions with context and requirements, acceptance criteria, suggested assignees based on expertise and availability, realistic due dates, and relevant tags or custom fields. The system learns from organizational patterns to ensure generated tasks align with team conventions and quality standards. Eliminates the tedious work of writing detailed task specifications while ensuring consistency and completeness across all project tasks.
✓ Eliminates the tedious work of writing detailed task specifications while ensuring consistency and completeness across all project tasks
Both Make (Integromat) and Asana AI offer Advanced Data Transformation. Make (Integromat)'s approach focuses on make includes a comprehensive suite of data transformation functions that allow users to manipulate, format, and restructure data as it flows between applications., while Asana AI emphasizes asana ai's smart task generation capability automatically creates detailed, well-structured tasks from minimal input, dramatically reducing the administrative burden on project managers and team leads.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Execution History & Debugging
Asana AIMake (Integromat)
Every scenario execution in Make is logged with complete visibility into each step's input data, output data, and processing time. Users can replay any historical execution to understand exactly what happened, making troubleshooting straightforward even for complex multi-step workflows. The platform provides real-time execution monitoring where users can watch data flow through their scenarios step by step, with the ability to pause execution and inspect intermediate values. Failed executions are automatically flagged with detailed error messages and the option to retry from the point of failure rather than restarting the entire workflow. Reduces debugging time from hours to minutes by providing complete transparency into automation execution, enabling rapid identification and resolution of issues.
✓ Reduces debugging time from hours to minutes by providing complete transparency into automation execution, enabling rapid identification and resolution of issues
Asana AI
The workflow automation engine combines rule-based automation with AI-powered intelligence to create sophisticated, adaptive workflows that respond dynamically to project conditions. Beyond simple if-then triggers, the system uses machine learning to identify patterns in how work flows through the organization, suggesting automation opportunities and proactively addressing potential bottlenecks. Users can create complex multi-step automations using natural language descriptions, and the AI translates these into executable workflow rules. The engine continuously monitors workflow performance, providing recommendations for optimization based on actual execution data and team feedback. Automates repetitive processes while continuously optimizing workflows based on real performance data, freeing teams to focus on strategic work.
✓ Automates repetitive processes while continuously optimizing workflows based on real performance data, freeing teams to focus on strategic work
Both Make (Integromat) and Asana AI offer Execution History & Debugging. Make (Integromat)'s approach focuses on every scenario execution in make is logged with complete visibility into each step's input data, output data, and processing time., while Asana AI emphasizes workflow automation engine combines rule-based automation with ai-powered intelligence to create sophisticated, adaptive workflows that respond dynamically to project conditions.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Teams & Organizations
Make (Integromat)Make (Integromat)
Make's collaboration features enable teams to work together on automation projects with role-based access controls, shared folders, and centralized administration. Organizations can create team workspaces where members collaborate on scenarios while maintaining appropriate permission boundaries—some users may have full editing rights while others can only view or execute automations. The platform includes version history for scenarios, allowing teams to track changes over time and roll back to previous versions if needed. Enterprise customers gain additional governance features including audit logs, SSO integration, and the ability to enforce organizational policies across all team automations. Enables automation centers of excellence where teams can collaborate on building, maintaining, and governing automations across the organization with appropriate oversight.
✓ Enables automation centers of excellence where teams can collaborate on building, maintaining, and governing automations across the organization with appropriate oversight
Asana AI
Asana AI revolutionizes status reporting by automatically generating comprehensive project status updates based on actual work completed, tasks in progress, and upcoming deadlines. The system analyzes project activity across all tasks and team members, identifies significant progress, potential risks, and notable achievements, and compiles this information into professional status reports ready for stakeholder distribution. Users can customize the format, detail level, and focus areas, and the AI adapts its reporting style to match organizational preferences. The feature eliminates the Friday afternoon scramble to compile status updates while ensuring reports are always accurate and current. Transforms status reporting from a time-consuming manual process into an automated, always-accurate reflection of actual project progress.
✓ Transforms status reporting from a time-consuming manual process into an automated, always-accurate reflection of actual project progress
Both Make (Integromat) and Asana AI offer Teams & Organizations. Make (Integromat)'s approach focuses on make's collaboration features enable teams to work together on automation projects with role-based access controls, shared folders, and centralized administration., while Asana AI emphasizes asana ai revolutionizes status reporting by automatically generating comprehensive project status updates based on actual work completed, tasks in progress, and upcoming deadlines.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Make (Integromat)
Strengths
- ✓Visual Scenario Builder: Make's visual scenario builder provides an infinite canvas where users construct automations by dragging and dropping application modules and connecti...
- ✓1,500+ App Integrations: Make maintains one of the largest libraries of pre-built application integrations in the automation industry, with over 1,500 native connectors spanni...
- ✓Advanced Data Transformation: Make includes a comprehensive suite of data transformation functions that allow users to manipulate, format, and restructure data as it flows between...
- ✓Execution History & Debugging: Every scenario execution in Make is logged with complete visibility into each step's input data, output data, and processing time. Users can replay an...
- ✓Teams & Organizations: Make's collaboration features enable teams to work together on automation projects with role-based access controls, shared folders, and centralized ad...
Weaknesses
- ✗AI-generated content requires human review to ensure accuracy and brand voice consistency.
- ✗Initial setup and integration may require technical resources or onboarding support.
- ✗Feature depth means users may not utilize all capabilities, potentially reducing ROI for simpler use cases.
Asana AI
Strengths
- ✓AI Project Planning: Asana AI's project planning capability transforms how teams initiate and structure new initiatives by leveraging natural language processing to interp...
- ✓Intelligent Summarization: The intelligent summarization feature employs advanced natural language understanding to automatically analyze and condense lengthy project communicat...
- ✓Smart Task Generation: Asana AI's smart task generation capability automatically creates detailed, well-structured tasks from minimal input, dramatically reducing the admini...
- ✓Workflow Automation Engine: The workflow automation engine combines rule-based automation with AI-powered intelligence to create sophisticated, adaptive workflows that respond dy...
- ✓AI-Powered Status Updates: Asana AI revolutionizes status reporting by automatically generating comprehensive project status updates based on actual work completed, tasks in pro...
Weaknesses
- ✗AI-generated content requires human review to ensure accuracy and brand voice consistency.
- ✗Initial setup and integration may require technical resources or onboarding support.
- ✗Feature depth means users may not utilize all capabilities, potentially reducing ROI for simpler use cases.
Industry-Specific Fit
| Industry | Make (Integromat) | Asana AI | Better Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-commerce | Make serves e-commerce businesses by automating the complex workflows that span order management, inventory synchronization, customer communication, and fulfillment operations. Online retailers use Make to connect their storefronts (Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce) with inventory systems, shipping carriers, accounting software, and customer service platforms, ensuring that orders flow seamlessly from purchase to delivery without manual intervention. Common automations include syncing product catalogs across multiple sales channels, automatically updating inventory levels when orders are placed, generating shipping labels and tracking notifications, and triggering post-purchase email sequences. | Not specified | Make (Integromat) |
| Marketing & Advertising | Marketing teams leverage Make to orchestrate campaigns across multiple channels, synchronize audience data between platforms, and automate reporting workflows. The platform connects advertising platforms (Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn), email marketing tools (Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, HubSpot), social media management systems, and analytics platforms into unified workflows. Marketers use Make to automatically sync leads from ad campaigns to CRM systems, trigger personalized email sequences based on user behavior, aggregate campaign performance data into dashboards, and coordinate content publishing across social channels. | Not specified | Make (Integromat) |
| SaaS & Technology | Software companies use Make to automate internal operations, enhance their products with integrations, and streamline customer onboarding processes. Development teams connect Make to project management tools, code repositories, CI/CD pipelines, and monitoring systems to automate DevOps workflows. Product teams use Make to sync customer data between their application and third-party services, automate user provisioning, and trigger notifications based on product events. Customer success teams automate onboarding sequences, usage tracking, and renewal workflows. | Not specified | Make (Integromat) |
| Professional Services | Consulting firms, agencies, and professional service providers use Make to automate client management, project tracking, time billing, and document workflows. The platform connects CRM systems with project management tools, accounting software, and document repositories to create end-to-end client lifecycle automation. Common use cases include automatically creating project structures when deals close, syncing time entries to invoicing systems, generating client reports from multiple data sources, and automating contract and proposal workflows. | Consulting firms, law practices, and professional services organizations use Asana AI to manage client engagements, track billable work, and ensure consistent service delivery. The AI's project planning capabilities help standardize engagement methodologies, while intelligent summarization keeps partners informed about project status across their portfolio. Workflow automation ensures compliance with firm procedures and client requirements without manual oversight. | Tie |
| Healthcare | Healthcare organizations leverage Make to automate patient communication, appointment management, and administrative workflows while maintaining compliance with privacy regulations. The platform connects electronic health record systems, scheduling software, patient communication tools, and billing systems. Healthcare providers use Make to automate appointment reminders, patient intake form processing, insurance verification workflows, and care coordination communications between providers. | Not specified | Make (Integromat) |
| Financial Services | Financial services firms use Make to automate data processing, client reporting, compliance workflows, and operational processes. The platform connects trading systems, portfolio management tools, CRM systems, and reporting platforms. Common automations include aggregating data from multiple sources for client reports, automating compliance documentation, syncing client information across systems, and triggering alerts based on market conditions or account changes. | Banks, investment firms, and financial services companies leverage Asana AI to manage regulatory projects, coordinate audit preparations, and streamline operational processes. The AI's summarization capabilities help compliance teams stay on top of regulatory changes, while workflow automation ensures consistent execution of financial processes. The platform's security features and access controls meet the stringent requirements of financial industry regulations. | Tie |
| Education | Educational institutions and EdTech companies use Make to automate student communication, enrollment processes, learning management workflows, and administrative operations. The platform connects learning management systems, student information systems, communication tools, and payment processors. Schools and training providers automate enrollment confirmations, course reminders, certificate generation, progress tracking notifications, and integration between online learning platforms and administrative systems. | Not specified | Make (Integromat) |
| Real Estate | Real estate professionals use Make to automate lead management, property listing syndication, transaction coordination, and client communication workflows. The platform connects CRM systems, listing platforms, document management tools, and communication channels. Agents and brokerages automate lead capture and distribution, property alert notifications, transaction milestone tracking, and marketing campaign coordination across multiple listing services. | Not specified | Make (Integromat) |
Our Verdict
Make (Integromat) and Asana AI are both strong AI Operations solutions. Make (Integromat) excels at visual scenario builder. Asana AI stands out for 1,500+ app integrations. Choose based on which specific features and approach best fit your workflow and requirements.
Choose Make (Integromat) if you:
- ✓You need visual scenario builder capabilities
- ✓You need advanced data transformation capabilities
- ✓You operate in E-commerce
Choose Asana AI if you:
- ✓You need 1,500+ app integrations capabilities
- ✓You need execution history & debugging capabilities
- ✓You operate in Technology & Software
Need Help Choosing?
Get expert guidance on selecting between Make (Integromat) and Asana AI for your specific use case.
Find a Strategy PartnerFrequently Asked Questions
Sources & Evidence
Visual scenario builder with AI-powered automation suggestions and natural language workflow creation for building complex multi-step automations without coding
Source: Make's visual scenario editor combined with AI capabilities allows users to build workflows by connecting apps visually on an infinite canvas, with AI suggesting automation patterns and optimizations based on usage patterns. The platform processes over 2 billion operations monthly across its user base and supports 1,500+ pre-built integrations with native connectors, making it one of the most comprehensive no-code automation platforms available. Users can describe workflows in plain English and have Make generate the corresponding automation structure, dramatically reducing time-to-value for new automations.
Natural language AI assistant that generates complete project plans, intelligent summaries, and detailed task descriptions from conversational prompts, reducing planning time by up to 80%
Source: Asana's AI features enable users to create comprehensive project structures including tasks, subtasks, dependencies, timelines, and documentation through simple conversational inputs. According to Asana's product documentation and customer testimonials, teams report significant reductions in project setup time, with the AI assistant capable of generating in seconds what traditionally required hours of manual planning. The system's contextual understanding allows it to interpret vague requests and produce structured, actionable project frameworks that align with organizational best practices.