AI Research
Connected Papers
by Connected Papers
410 reviews
Visual tool for exploring paper relationships through similarity-based graphs to find relevant research quickly
📌Key Takeaways
- 1Connected Papers is a ai research AI agent by Connected Papers, founded in 2019.
- 2Visual tool for exploring paper relationships through similarity-based graphs to find relevant research quickly
- 3Top strengths: Visual Graph Generation: Connected Papers' signature feature transforms complex citation networks into intuitive visual graphs where each paper appears as a node, with connect...; Prior and Derivative Works Analysis: Beyond the main similarity graph, Connected Papers provides specialized views that separate a paper's intellectual ancestry from its subsequent influe....
- 4Rated 4.9/5 based on 410 reviews.
Category
AI Research
Founded
2019
Overview
Connected Papers is a revolutionary AI-powered research discovery platform that transforms the way academics, researchers, and students explore scientific literature. Unlike traditional academic search engines that return linear lists of results, Connected Papers leverages sophisticated machine learning algorithms to analyze citation networks, semantic content similarity, and topical relationships between scholarly papers, presenting this complex web of knowledge as an intuitive, interactive visual graph. At its core, Connected Papers addresses one of the most persistent challenges in academic research: the difficulty of comprehensively mapping a research landscape and discovering relevant papers that might be missed through conventional keyword searches. When a researcher inputs a paper—whether by title, DOI, arXiv ID, or direct URL—the platform's AI engine analyzes the paper's citation network and content to identify related works, then generates a dynamic visualization where each node represents a paper and connections indicate relationships based on shared citations and conceptual similarity. The visual graph interface enables researchers to immediately grasp the structure of a research field, identifying seminal works (shown as larger nodes with many connections), emerging trends, and potential gaps in the literature. Papers are color-coded by publication year, allowing users to track the evolution of ideas over time and distinguish foundational works from recent developments. This temporal dimension is particularly valuable for literature reviews, helping researchers understand how concepts have developed and which papers represent the current state of the art. Connected Papers serves a diverse user base spanning graduate students beginning their thesis research, postdoctoral researchers exploring new fields, established academics staying current with developments in their specialty, and industry R&D professionals conducting technology scouting. The platform supports papers from virtually all academic disciplines, with particularly strong coverage in STEM fields, social sciences, and humanities. By democratizing access to sophisticated bibliometric analysis tools that were previously available only through expensive institutional subscriptions or specialized software, Connected Papers has become an essential tool in the modern researcher's toolkit, fundamentally changing how scientific knowledge is discovered and connected.
🎯 Key Differentiator
AI-ExtractedAI-powered visual graph generation that maps paper relationships through citation patterns and content similarity, creating an interactive network visualization of research landscapes
Connected Papers uniquely uses machine learning algorithms to analyze citation networks and paper content, generating visual graphs that show how papers relate to each other. This is distinct from traditional search engines that return linear lists of results. The visual approach allows researchers to see the entire research landscape at once rather than sequential results. According to user testimonials, researchers report discovering 30-50% more relevant papers compared to traditional search methods, with the visual format enabling pattern recognition that would be impossible with linear result lists.
This differentiator was AI-extracted from competitive research.
Claim this page to verify and unlock →Last verified: January 28, 2026
Key Features
Visual Graph Generation
Connected Papers' signature feature transforms complex citation networks into intuitive visual graphs where each paper appears as a node, with connections representing citation relationships and content similarity. The AI engine analyzes thousands of papers to identify meaningful relationships, positioning closely related works near each other in the visualization. Node size indicates the paper's influence within the network (based on citation count and centrality), while color coding represents publication year, enabling researchers to instantly distinguish foundational works from recent developments. Users can zoom, pan, and interact with the graph to explore different areas of the research landscape, clicking on any node to view paper details, abstracts, and direct links to full texts. Researchers can comprehend an entire research field's structure in minutes rather than hours, identifying key papers and relationships that would be missed through traditional linear search results.
Prior and Derivative Works Analysis
Beyond the main similarity graph, Connected Papers provides specialized views that separate a paper's intellectual ancestry from its subsequent influence. The 'Prior Works' view identifies foundational papers that the selected work builds upon, tracing the intellectual lineage and theoretical foundations of research. Conversely, the 'Derivative Works' view shows papers that have cited and built upon the selected work, revealing how ideas have been extended, applied, or challenged. This bidirectional analysis helps researchers understand both the historical context of research and its ongoing impact, essential for comprehensive literature reviews and identifying research trajectories. Users can trace the complete intellectual history of any research topic, understanding both where ideas originated and how they've evolved, enabling more thorough and contextualized literature reviews.
Multi-Paper Graph Building
Connected Papers allows researchers to build comprehensive graphs by adding multiple seed papers, creating a unified visualization that shows how different papers and research threads interconnect. This feature is particularly valuable for interdisciplinary research or when exploring how different approaches to a problem relate to each other. Users can start with several key papers from their reading list and generate a combined graph that reveals unexpected connections, identifies bridging papers that link different research communities, and provides a holistic view of complex research landscapes spanning multiple sub-fields or methodological approaches. Researchers working on interdisciplinary projects or complex topics can map relationships across multiple research threads, discovering connections and bridging works that would be invisible when examining papers individually.
Paper Details and Metadata
Each paper in the Connected Papers graph includes comprehensive metadata displayed in an accessible sidebar panel. Users can view full abstracts, author lists, publication venues, citation counts, and publication dates without leaving the platform. The interface provides direct links to the paper on its original source (journal website, arXiv, PubMed, etc.) as well as links to the paper on Google Scholar for additional context. For papers available as open access, Connected Papers often provides direct PDF links, streamlining the research workflow by reducing the need to navigate multiple databases and repositories. Researchers can evaluate paper relevance directly within the platform, accessing abstracts and metadata to make informed decisions about which papers to read in full, significantly accelerating the literature review process.
Shareable Graph Links
Connected Papers generates unique, shareable URLs for every graph created on the platform, enabling seamless collaboration and knowledge sharing among research teams. When a researcher discovers a valuable graph visualization, they can share the exact view with colleagues, supervisors, or students via a simple link. Recipients see the identical graph with all papers and connections preserved, facilitating discussions about research directions, collaborative literature reviews, and educational contexts where instructors want to show students the landscape of a research area. This feature transforms individual discovery into collaborative knowledge building. Research teams can collaborate effectively on literature reviews and research planning, sharing discoveries instantly and building collective understanding of research landscapes without requiring recipients to recreate searches.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- +Visual Graph Generation: Connected Papers' signature feature transforms complex citation networks into intuitive visual graphs where each paper appears as a node, with connect...
- +Prior and Derivative Works Analysis: Beyond the main similarity graph, Connected Papers provides specialized views that separate a paper's intellectual ancestry from its subsequent influe...
- +Multi-Paper Graph Building: Connected Papers allows researchers to build comprehensive graphs by adding multiple seed papers, creating a unified visualization that shows how diff...
- +Paper Details and Metadata: Each paper in the Connected Papers graph includes comprehensive metadata displayed in an accessible sidebar panel. Users can view full abstracts, auth...
- +Shareable Graph Links: Connected Papers generates unique, shareable URLs for every graph created on the platform, enabling seamless collaboration and knowledge sharing among...
Cons
- −AI-generated content requires human review to ensure accuracy and brand voice consistency.
- −Initial setup and integration may require technical resources or onboarding support.
- −Feature depth means users may not utilize all capabilities, potentially reducing ROI for simpler use cases.
Use Cases
Explore all AI Research use cases →Graduate Thesis Literature Review→
Graduate students beginning their thesis research face the daunting task of comprehensively mapping the existing literature in their field. Traditional database searches return hundreds or thousands of results that must be manually reviewed, with no clear indication of which papers are most influential or how different works relate to each other. Students often spend months reading papers only to discover they've missed seminal works or failed to understand important connections between research threads. This inefficient process delays thesis progress and can result in literature reviews that miss critical context or fail to position the student's contribution appropriately within the field.
Systematic Review Protocol Development→
Researchers conducting systematic reviews for evidence-based medicine must comprehensively identify all relevant studies on a clinical question—missing important studies can invalidate the review's conclusions. Traditional systematic review methodology requires searching multiple databases with complex Boolean queries, screening thousands of abstracts, and manually tracking citation networks. This process is extremely time-consuming, often taking 6-12 months, and despite best efforts, relevant studies are frequently missed. The challenge is particularly acute for reviews spanning multiple disciplines or examining interventions studied under different names or in different contexts.
Patent Prior Art Search→
Patent attorneys and IP professionals must conduct thorough prior art searches to assess patentability of inventions and defend against infringement claims. Scientific literature represents a critical source of prior art, but traditional academic database searches often miss relevant publications due to terminology differences between patent and academic language. Furthermore, understanding how a technology has evolved and which publications represent the state of the art at specific dates is essential for patent prosecution and litigation. The sheer volume of scientific literature and the complexity of citation relationships make comprehensive prior art searches extremely challenging and expensive.
Research Grant Proposal Background→
Faculty members writing research grant proposals must demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of the existing literature and clearly position their proposed research within the field. Grant reviewers expect applicants to cite seminal works, acknowledge recent developments, and identify specific gaps that the proposed research will address. However, busy faculty often lack time for exhaustive literature reviews, and traditional search methods may miss important papers outside their immediate specialty. Proposals that fail to adequately contextualize the research or miss key citations are frequently rejected, wasting significant time and effort invested in proposal preparation.
Technology Scouting for R&D→
Technology companies must continuously monitor academic research to identify emerging technologies, potential acquisition targets, and threats to their competitive position. Traditional approaches to technology scouting—attending conferences, reading journals, monitoring patent filings—are time-consuming and often miss important developments in adjacent fields. R&D managers struggle to maintain comprehensive awareness of research landscapes, particularly in fast-moving fields like artificial intelligence where preprints and rapid publication cycles make it difficult to stay current. Missing an important development can result in duplicated R&D efforts, missed partnership opportunities, or competitive disadvantage.
Course Curriculum Development→
Professors developing new courses or updating existing curricula must identify the most important papers and concepts to include in reading lists and lectures. This requires understanding not just individual papers but how they relate to each other and to the overall structure of the field. Traditional approaches to curriculum development rely heavily on the professor's existing knowledge and may miss important recent developments or fail to represent the field's structure accurately. Students benefit most from curricula that help them understand how ideas connect and develop, but creating such curricula requires significant time investment in literature review and organization.
Interdisciplinary Research Exploration→
Postdoctoral researchers often need to expand into new research areas or bridge multiple disciplines to develop independent research programs. However, entering a new field is challenging—researchers don't know the key papers, major researchers, or how different sub-areas relate to each other. Traditional literature searches are particularly ineffective for interdisciplinary exploration because researchers don't know the right keywords or which journals to search. This knowledge gap can lead to months of inefficient reading, missed connections to relevant work in other fields, and difficulty positioning interdisciplinary research for publication and funding.
Competitive Intelligence for Startups→
Deep tech startups building products based on academic research must thoroughly understand the intellectual landscape of their technology area. This includes identifying the key academic papers underlying their technology, understanding how competitors are building on the same research, and staying current with developments that could affect their competitive position. Founders often come from academic backgrounds but may not have comprehensive knowledge of adjacent research areas. Missing important papers can lead to IP vulnerabilities, duplicated development efforts, or failure to identify potential academic collaborators and advisors.
Frequently Asked Questions
Similar AI Agents
Consensus Review: Features & Alternatives
AI-powered academic search engine that finds and synthesizes answers from 200M+ peer-reviewed papers with Consensus Meter.
Elicit Review: Features & Alternatives
AI research assistant for systematic reviews with paper search, data extraction, and synthesis across 125M+ papers.
Litmaps Review: Features & Alternatives
Research discovery platform with interactive citation maps, seed-based discovery, and collaborative literature review features.
Perplexity AI Review: Features & Alternatives
AI-powered search engine that synthesizes web knowledge into cited, conversational answers with follow-up capabilities.
Research Rabbit Review: Features & Alternatives
Free AI-powered citation mapping tool that discovers related papers and visualizes research networks from seed papers.
Scholarcy Review: Features & Alternatives
AI-powered paper summarizer that creates flashcards from research articles with key findings, figures, and references.